Radiographic outcomes and non-union factor analysis in fragmentary segmental femoral shaft fractures (AO/OTA 32C3) treated with reamed antegrade nailing.

This study retrospectively assessed radiographic outcomes and risk factors associated with non-union in femoral shaft fragmentary segmental fractures (AO/OTA 32C3) treated with reamed antegrade intra-medullary nailing. Radiological outcomes, including union and alignment, were evaluated. The risk factors for non-union were investigated, including demographics and treatment-related characteristics, such as the number of interlocking screws, segmentation length, main third fragment length, distance of the main third fragment, width ratio and exposed nail length in one cortex from immediate post-operative radiographs. Multivariate logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Among 2295 femoral shaft fracture patients from three level-1 trauma centers, 51 met the inclusion criteria. The radiological union was achieved in 37 patients (73%) with a mean union time of 10.7 ± 4.8 months. The acceptable axial alignment was observed in 30 patients (59%). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified only exposed nail length as a significant risk factor for non-union (odds ratio: 1.599, p = 0.003) and the cut-off value was 19.1 mm (sensitivity, 0.786; specificity, 0.811). The study revealed high rates of non-union (27%) and malalignment (41%). Therefore, patients who underwent intramedullary nailing with an exposed nail length greater than 19.1 mm or about twice the nail diameter should be cautioned of the potential non-union.

Plate augmentation and hybrid bone grafting are effective treatments for atrophic nonunion of the femur with the original intramedullary nail retained in situ.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of plate augmentation and hybrid bone grafting for treating atrophic nonunion of the femur with original intramedullary nail retained in situ.In this study, 36 patients with atrophic nonunion of the femur who underwent surgery using the technique of plate augmentation and a hybrid bone grafting while retaining the original intramedullary nail in situ in Xi'an Honghui Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were enrolled. 28 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were ultimately included in the study. These 28 patients, consisting of 20 males and 8 females with a mean age of 38 years, were evaluated based on factors such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the average hospitalization days. Additionally, the results and function of these patients were evaluated by union time, Wu's scores of limb function and incidence of serious complications.All 28 patients achieved bone union at the 12 month follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 14.6 ± 4.2 months.The average operation time was 68.3 ± 11.2 min, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 140 ± 22.6 ml. Patients were hospitalized for an average of 5.8 ± 1.1 days. Full clinical and radiological bone union was achieved on average at 5.1 ± 1.9 months. The mean value of Wu's scores at the 12 month follow-up was significantly higher than before the operation. Limb function was excellent in 27 patients and good in one patient at the 12 month follow-up. However, five patients experienced the lower limb vein thrombosis, including one deep vein thrombosis and four lower limb intermuscular vein thromboses. One patient had a superficial infections of the surgical incision site, while three patients reported pain and numbness where their iliac bone graft was extracted at the 12 month follow-up. The technique of plate augmentation and hybrid bone grafting, combined with retaining the original intramedullary nail in situ has been shown to be a safe, effective, simply and standardizable practice for treating atrophic femoral nonunion with an intact original IMN fixation.

Femoral Shaft Fracture Developed Late-Onset Infection in 27 Years after Intramedullary Nailing: A Case Report.

Postoperative late-onset infections more than 1 year after intramedullary nail surgery for femoral shaft fractures are very rare. We show an extremely rare case of developed late-onset infection 27 years after surgery, report on risk factors for late-onset infection, and infer why the infection occurred.

Comparing outcomes of plate augmentation, nail exchange, and nail exchange with plate augmentation in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rates in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Treated with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) are the most common elbow fracture in the pediatric population. In the case of displaced fractures, closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning (CRPP) is commonly performed. Infection rates are between 0 and 7%; however, retrospective studies have shown no benefit of preoperative antibiotics. There continues to be notable variability in antibiotic usage based on surgeon preference and local institutional policy. We conducted a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of infection in pediatric SCHF patients treated with CRPP. METHODS: Pediatric patients with displaced SCHF who presented to a pediatric hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups. Group I received one dose of prophylactic antibiotics (25 mg/kg cefazolin IV up to 1g or clindamycin 10 mg/kg up to 600 mg/kg IV in the case of cefazolin allergy). Group II received placebo (10-mL prefilled syringe of normal saline). All patients underwent CRPP and casting followed by pin removal 3 to 6 weeks after the initial procedure. The presence of pin-site infection, erythema, drainage, septic arthritis, and osteomyelitis was recorded. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in the study. Eighty-two patients were randomized to receive antibiotics, and 78 patients were randomized to placebo. No difference was seen in the rate of infection between the treatment groups (1.2% in the antibiotic group versus 1.3% in the placebo group; P = 1.00). Presence of purulent drainage (0.0% versus 1.3%; P = 0.49), septic arthritis (0.0% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00), and osteomyelitis (1.2% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00) was similar in both groups. No difference in the need for additional antibiotics (1.2% versus 1.3%; P = 1.00) or additional surgery (1.2% versus 0.0%; P = 1.00) was found between groups. DISCUSSION: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis did not affect the risk of infection in pediatric patients who underwent CRPP for displaced SCHF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261830. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I.

Comparing short vs. intermediate and long nails in elderly patients with unstable multifragmental femoral trochanteric fractures (AO type A2): Multicenter (TRON group) retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Unstable femoral trochanteric fractures (FTFs), especially Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/ the Orthopedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 31-A2 fractures, which are multifragment fractures, occur in elderly individuals with osteoporosis and are associated with high mortality and complication rates due to prolonged immobilization. Longer nails (LNs) were developed to obtain superior fracture site stabilization in unstable FTFs. We hypothesized that the postoperative outcomes of elderly patients with unstable FTFs treated with LNs would be superior to those of patients treated with short nails (SNs), with fewer complications. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of SNs versus LNs in elderly patients with unstable FTFs. From the Trauma Research Group of our university (TRON) database, 1854 trochanteric fractures treated between January 2016 and December 2020 were extracted. A total of 174 patients>65 years of age with AO/OTA 31-A2 fractures were included in the present study. They were divided into the SN group and the LN group and matched for age and sex. Parameters such as operative time, blood loss, survival rate, Parker Mobility Score (PMS), and numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, complications, and radiographic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Both groups included 67 patients with an average age of 87.32 years. The LN group had a longer operative time (76.52 min vs. 51.61 min, P < 0.001) and more blood loss (106.79 mL vs. 49.98 mL, P = 0.014) in comparison to the SN group. However, the 1-year survival rate, PMS, and NRS for pain did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the groups. The rates of complications, including screw cutout, nonunion, implant breakage, osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and surgical site infections, were comparable. The radiographic findings, including the nail/canal ratio, progression of varus, and sliding distance, were also similar. CONCLUSION: Although LNs are associated with longer operative times and increased blood loss, the overall outcomes and complication rates are comparable to those of SNs in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 type unstable FTFs. The use of LNs did not confer any distinct advantages for this specific type of fracture.

Results of a simple treatment protocol for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion in 330 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Our primary aim of the study was to assess the results of a treatment protocol for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion treated by three techniques - Exchange Nailing (EN), Plate Augmentation (PA), and Exchange Nailing combined with Plate augmentation (NP). The secondary objective was to assess the radiological outcome, duration of surgery (DOS) and need for blood transfusion (BT) in all the three groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 330 patients treated for AFNU between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019. Using a simple treatment algorithm, EN, PA and NP were performed in 24,183 and 123 patients respectively. Patients in all the three groups were assessed for radiological-union (union rate and time to union), DOS and BT. RESULTS: Of these 330 patients, 327 (99 %) patients achieved radiological union at a mean duration of 6.07 months. Union rate is highest with NP followed by PA and EN. The union rate in patients with NP, PA and EN were 100 %, 99.5 % and 91.7 % respectively (p < 0.01). Time to union was lowest for NP followed by PA and EN (p < 0.001).The mean time to union for NP, PA and EN were 3.76, 7.2and 9.21 months respectively (p < 0.001). The mean DOS in minutes for NP, EN and PA was 107, 94 and 82 respectively (p < 0.01). The mean need for BT in the form of packed red blood cells for NP, PA and EN were 1.95, 1.87 and 1.38 units respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Following a simple algorithm to decide treatment protocol on a case-to case basis helps to achieve good results in an optimal time period. When compared with EN and PA, NP is associated with 100 % union rate with least time to union making NP a reasonably effective procedure with a very high success rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Failure after intramedullary nailing for geriatric trochanteric fracture: does quality of fracture reduction on the AP and lateral planes show the same results?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the failure of trochanteric fracture fixation according to the quality of fracture reduction on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. METHODS: Data from 340 female and 152 male patients ≥ 60 years of age who underwent intramedullary nailing for a trochanteric fracture between 2016 and 2020 were analysed retrospectively. The quality of fracture reduction was classified as type A, type E, and type I on the AP view and type N, type A, and type P on the lateral view according to the relative position of the proximal and distal fragments. The failure rate was evaluated and compared according to the quality of fracture reduction. The risk factors of the fixation failure were investigated by comparison of variables between patients with and without failure and by regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with poor reduction, type I and type P had higher failure rates. However, a statistically significant difference was found only for patients with poor reduction (type P) on the lateral view (p < 0.001). Patients with failure showed significantly higher rates of poor reduction on the lateral view and AO/OTA type A3 fractures. The regression analysis also showed that poor reduction on the lateral view (odds ratio [OR] 12.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-40.6; p < 0.001) and AO/OTA type A3 fractures (OR 5.40; 95% CI 1.24-23.49, p = 0.025) were risk factors for failure. CONCLUSION: Poor reduction such as type P reduction was associated with failure after intramedullary nailing for trochanteric fractures. Surgeons should check the quality of fracture reduction carefully with the proper fluoroscopic view to prevent failure in geriatric patients with trochanteric fractures.

Evaluation of simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails in achondroplasia with rhizomelic short stature: a retrospective study of 15 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis in patients with achondroplasia is insufficiently reported. We aimed to perform the first study that exclusively analyzed simultaneous bilateral femoral distraction osteogenesis with motorized intramedullary lengthening nails via an antegrade approach in patients with achondroplasia focused on reliability, accuracy, precision, and the evolving complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective singlecenter study we analyzed patients with achondroplasia who underwent simultaneous bilateral femoral lengthening with antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails between October 2014 and April 2019. 15 patients (30 femoral segments) of median age 14 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 29 months (IQR 27-37) after nail implantation. RESULTS: The median distraction length per segment was 49 mm (IQR 47-51) with a median distraction index of 1.0 mm/day (IQR 0.9-1.0), and a median consolidation index of 20 days/cm (IQR 17-23). Reliability of the lengthening nails was 97% and their calculated accuracy and precision were 96% and 95%, respectively. The most common complication was temporary restriction of knee range of motion during distraction in 10 of 30 of the lengthened segments. 1 patient was treated with 2 unplanned additional surgeries due to premature consolidation. CONCLUSION: The method is reliable and accurate with few complications.

Subtrochanteric nonunion after intramedullary nailing due to pathological fracture: proximal femoral replacement as a salvage approach.

PURPOSE: To assess proximal femoral replacement as a treatment solution for nonunion of pathologic subtrochanteric fractures after cephalomedullary nailing in patients with pathological fracture and previously irradiated bone. METHODS: Retrospective review of five patients with pathological subtrochanteric femoral fractures that were treated with cephalomedullary nailing and developed a nonunion, which was revised with conversion to a proximal endoprosthetic replacement. RESULTS: All five patients had previously been treated with radiation. One patient had the latest follow-up at 2 months postoperatively. At that time, the patient was walking with a walker for assistance, with no evidence of hardware failure or loosening on imaging. The remaining four patients had the latest follow-up ranging from 9 to 20 months after surgery. At their latest follow-up, three of the four patients were ambulatory with no pain, using only a cane for assistance with longer distances. The other patient demonstrated pain in his affected thigh, utilizing a walker for assistance with ambulation at latest follow-up, but not requiring further surgical interventions. There were no hardware failures or implant loosening through the follow-up period. None of the patients required revision, and there were no postoperative complications observed at their last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pathological fractures in the subtrochanteric region that is treated with cephalomedullary nailing and developed a nonunion, treatment with conversion to a proximal femoral replacement with a mega prosthesis is a valuable treatment with good functional results and low risk for complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV.

Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in a Level I Trauma Center in Finland: What Complications Can be Expected?

BACKGROUND: Intertrochanteric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in older people, and the number is estimated to increase. These fractures are often treated with intramedullary nailing; however, various complications have been reported. It is important to identify the potential complications and investigate whether the choice of implant and patient-related factors are associated with the risk of complications to develop better strategies for preventing them. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) In the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with intramedullary nailing, what are the risks of major complications and 30-day mortality? (2) Which implant types are associated with greater odds of major complications? (3) Which patient-related factors are associated with increased odds of major complications? METHODS: In this retrospective, comparative study, we reviewed the health records of 2397 patients with a femoral fracture treated at one Level I trauma center between January 2014 and November 2020. Of those, we considered patients who were treated with intramedullary nailing for an intertrochanteric fracture after sustaining a low-energy injury as potentially eligible. Based on this criterion, 53% (1279) were eligible; a further 47% (1118) were excluded because the fixation method was other than intramedullary nailing, the fracture pattern was other than intertrochanteric fracture, or the fracture was caused by a high-energy injury mechanism. Another 4% (97) were excluded because they had incomplete datasets because of follow-up less than 12 months, leaving 49% (1182) for analysis. During the study period, intramedullary nails were generally used to treat nearly all intertrochanteric fractures at our hospital. The risk of complications was then assessed by chart review. Acute myocardial ischemia, cutout, nail breakage, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, stroke, and wound infection were defined as major complications. Cutout, nail breakage, and wound infection were defined as major complications leading to reoperation. To examine the association of implant type and major complications, a logistic regression analysis was performed. Additionally, the risks of major complications leading to reoperation were compared between implants. Finally, a univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between patient-related factors and major complications. RESULTS: The overall proportion of patients experiencing complications was 16% (183 of 1182), and the crude percentage of 30-day mortality was 9% (107 of 1182) based on the hospital`s medical records. After controlling for patient-related factors such as disease, age, and smoking, we found that nail type was not associated with odds of major complications leading to reoperation (Gamma3: OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.44 to 1.67]; p = 0.67; Trochanteric Fixation Nail: OR 0.61 [95% CI 0.2 to 1.53]; p = 0.33; Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation: OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.16 to 1.49]; p = 0.29) compared with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced. Anticoagulation (OR 1.70 [95% CI 1.11 to 2.59]; p = 0.01), congestive heart failure (OR 1.91 [95% CI 1.13 to 3.11]; p = 0.01), and hypertension (OR 1.67 [95% CI 1.08 to 2.63]; p = 0.02) were associated with a major complication. Liver disease (OR 5.19 [95% CI 0.78 to 20.8]; p = 0.04) was associated with a major complication leading to reoperation. CONCLUSION: This study provides a better understanding of the occurrence of surgical and medical complications after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures. The new-generation nail types are comparable options based on the risk of reoperation. Anticoagulation, congestive heart failure, and hypertension were associated with major complications, highlighting the need for careful management and monitoring of these comorbidities during intramedullary nailing procedures.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Should trochanteric fractures in elderly patients be treated by arthroplasty or internal fixation?

Most trochanteric fractures are treated by fixation, most often intramedullary. Nevertheless, the desire to have patients walk as soon as possible and the fear of fixation failure has driven some surgeons to carry out an arthroplasty instead, especially for unstable fractures and/or in patients with severe osteoporosis, in order to avoid the difficult conversion to arthroplasty later on if the fixation fails. The aim of this review was to specify the role, technique and results of performing arthroplasty in this context. In which fractures? Unstable fractures (A2.2, A2.3 and A3), especially in osteoporotic bone, which are the most difficult to reduce and fix, and in cases with associated osteoarthritis. For which patients? Arthroplasty should not be done in patients who have ASA≤3 due to greater blood loss and longer operative time. Since the postoperative Parker score often drops, arthroplasty should not be done in patients having a Parker score<6. What are the technical problems? Arthroplasty must be done by an experienced surgeon because of the lack of anatomical landmarks, although fracture fixation has its own demands (satisfactory reduction, appropriate length and position of cervicocephalic screw). What are the results and complications? Despite several comparative studies (randomized trials, meta-analysis and prospective studies), it is difficult to draw any conclusions. These studies show worse performance of dynamic hip screws relative to intramedullary nails. The complication and revision rates were higher for nails than arthroplasty, but not in every study, while the functional outcomes with nails (with or without immediate weightbearing) were better than those of arthroplasty beyond 6 months. What is the mortality rate? It was lower after nailing in a few studies but was mainly determined by the patient's comorbidities and preoperative Parker score. The best indication for arthroplasty may be self-sufficient patients over 70 years of age who have an unstable fracture with severe osteoporosis. Nevertheless, new studies should be done to compare arthroplasty to nailing with immediate return to weightbearing in patients having the same type of fracture, defined using 3D CT scan. Level of evidence: Expert advice.

Nail-extraction device mismatch: an issue in developing countries intramedullary nail removal practice.

PURPOSE: Intramedullary nail is the gold standard in the management of long bone diaphyseal fractures of tibia and femur. The jig of these nails has corresponding extraction device whose pitch for nail coupling come in various sizes. This unlike plate and screws may be difficult to predict preoperatively and may pose a problem during removal. Difficulties in removal may arise due to the proliferation of nail brands especially in developing countries. The study aims to identify the incidence of extraction device mismatch among orthopaedic surgeons in Nigeria as well as the indications and complications associated with intramedullary nail removal. METHODS: A two-page questionnaire was administered to 87 orthopaedic surgeons attending the Annual General Meeting of the Nigerian Medical Association. The attitudes of the participants towards intramedullary nail were assessed. RESULTS: All participants agree to asymptomatic removal. Patients wish was the leading indication for asymptomatic removal among the participants. Sixty-one percent of the surgeons have had the need to remove a nail different from the brand in the hospital their practice. The commonest indication for symptomatic removal was infections. Forty-seven percent of the participant encountered nail extraction-device mismatch. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of extraction device mismatch may portend a public health issue. There may be need for patient who had intra medullary nail insertion to be told their brand. We advocate for standardization of extraction device pitch for intramedullary nail.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing or locked plating for stabilisation of distal femoral fractures? A comparative study of 193 patients.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of distal femoral fracture fixation of two different methods, lateral locking plate (LP) or an Intra-medullary nail (IMN), in patients managed in our institution. More specifically, to assess: (a) if there was a difference in functional outcomes between the LP and IMN groups; (b) whether the rate of complications was different between the two groups. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2018 adult patients with distal femoral fractures managed in our unit with either LP or IMN for extra and intra-articular fractures were eligible to participate. Demographic details, fracture type, procedures performed, time to union, complications and functional scores (Oxford Knee Score) were recorded and analysed. The mean follow up was 4 years (12-120 months). RESULTS: Out of 193 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 93 received an IMN whereas 100 patients were treated with LP. Mean age was 64.2 (18-99) and 70.1 (18-100) for the IMN and LP groups respectively. Overall, the two groups had similar demographics and there was no significant difference in the type of fractures sustained (p > 0.05). The Oxford Knee Score was highest for patients fixed with LP, mean 37.3 (6-48, SD 7.3) versus 28.4 (3-48, SD 14.4), (p = < 0.02) compared to the IMN group. In terms of complications, the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group 8.6% versus 4% in those patients treated with an IMN, p value < 0.01. CONCLUSION: While the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group and the functional results were superior in the plating group.

Mechanical outcomes of the TFNA, InterTAN and IMHS intramedullary nailing systems for the fixation of proximal femur fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures have become a major public health priority due to their increasing incidence. Intramedullary (IM) nailing has gained popularity as a surgical technique for managing these fractures. However, comparative studies with extramedullary devices indicate potentially increased mechanical complications associated with IM nailing. Specifically, there have been recent reports of early implant fracture associated with the TFNA system. This study compares the rate of mechanical complications between 3 implants. Secondarily, we analysed the factors associated with implant fracture and all other mechanical complications. METHODS: This retrospective study included 803 IM nails performed between 2008-2021 for the fixation of proximal femur fractures at a level 1 trauma centre. We recorded patient demographics, AO fracture classification, implant specification and intra-operative parameters such as tip-apex distance, Cleveland index, reduction quality, presence of medial calcar integrity, neck-shaft angle. The outcomes analysed included implant fracture, lag screw cut-out, >10 mm backing out, autodynamisation, periprosthetic fracture, non-union at 6 months and time to revision surgery. RESULTS: The overall implant fracture rate was 3.1 % (25/803), with no statistically significant difference between the three devices (p = 0.51). The TFNA group included 183 patients with a median follow-up of 1.6 years. The TFNA fracture rate was 2.2 % (4/183) which occurred at 207 +/- 16.66 days post-operatively. The rate of all mechanical complications was 4.9 % in the TFNA group, 12.9 % in the InterTAN group and 17 % in the IMHS group. Non-union (p < 0.001) and increasing lag screw length (p < 0.02) were identified as risk factors for implant fracture and other mechanical complications. The reverse oblique fracture pattern (AO 31 A3.1) was associated with mechanical complications only (p < 0.01). The cumulative survival rates without revision for the TFNA, InterTAN, IMHS groups were 97.8 %, 95.5 % and 87.9 % respectively at 2.5 years. DISCUSSION: The rates of implant fracture were comparable between the three nailing systems. The TFNA provides effective fixation for proximal femur fractures using a traditional screw without cement augmentation. The TFNA was associated with an overall reduction in mechanical complications compared to the InterTAN and IMHS. Previously reported mechanical complications associated with IM Nails may relate to older device designs.

Medial migration of the helical blade with penetration into the acetabulum: a rare complication using the TFNA nail.

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency and possible reasons of medial migration with penetration into the acetabulum (MMPA) of the helical blade when using the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced (TFNA) is used for treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. METHODS: All patients with pertrochanteric femoral fracture, treated by intramedullary femoral nailing with the TFNA, were retrospectively reviewed for MMPA of the helical blade. Epidemiological parameters, additional procedures, distance of medial migration, time from primary operation to revision as well as type of revision were assessed. RESULTS: 4 of 153 patients treated with the TFNA developed an MMPA of the helical blade (risk = 2.6%), with a mean medial migration of the blade of 11.6 mm (SD 8.8). The mean time from initial operation to revision surgery was 70 days (SD 30). All patients were revised by conversion to cemented total hip arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: MMPA of the helical blade is a rare but potentially hazardous complication of femoral nailing with the TFNA femoral nail, resulting in the necessity for revision surgery and total hip arthroplasty.

The role of postoperative piriformis fossa and greater trochanter tubercle distance to predict cutout failure after cephalomedullary nail fixation.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the association between postoperative piriformis fossa and greater trochanter tubercle distance (distance from the deepest point of piriformis fossa to the most lateral greater trochanter tubercle [PG]) and cutout failure after cephalomedullary nail (CMN) osteosynthesis for intertrochanter fracture (ITF). A rotating femur model was designed to analyze PG variation during femur rotation. METHODS: From 2005 to 2010, 311 patients diagnosed of ITF (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [AO/OTA] 31-A2 and A3) underwent CMN fixation at our institute were reviewed. Of these, 281 (90.3%) patients achieved union without complication, 21 (6.8%) had cutout failure, six (1.9%) had femoral head osteonecrosis, and three (1%) had nonunion during postoperative 2-year follow-up. The side difference of postoperative PG compared to contralateral uninjured hip (dPG) was analyzed between patients who had cutout failure and those who did not. In the rotating femur model, the PG was measured for every 2.5° increments of internal and external rotation from 0° to 50°. RESULTS: The dPG was significantly higher in the failure group (10.2 ± 4.2 vs 6.6 ± 3.5 mm, p <0.001). The odds ratio for lag screw cutout was 6.35 (95% CI, 1.10-11.6, p =0.003) for every 1 mm dPG increment. dPG exhibited high diagnostic performance in predicting cutout failure according to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve was 0.774 (95% CI, 0.711-0.837). dPG yielded the greatest sensitivity (78.4%) and specificity (78.4%) to predict lag screw cutout when cutoff value being 8.65 mm. In rotating femur model, PG change from baseline demonstrated significant ( p <0.001) positive and negative correlation with increased external and internal rotation, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increased dPG is a risk factor of cutout failure for ITF osteosynthesis with CMN. In conjunction with tip-apex distance, fracture displacement, and reduction quality; dPG can help surgeons interpret postoperative radiograph and predict failure. However, it should be noticed that a proper and standard patient positioning is critical for accurate dPG measurement.

Augmented versus non-augmented Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) nails for treating trochanteric fractures in patients over sixty-five years of age.

PURPOSE: Intramedullary nailing is a common treatment for pertrochanteric fractures. However, implant-related mechanical failures, such as cut-out and cut-through, lead to higher rates of revision surgery, loss of autonomy, and mortality. Cemented augmentation enhances the bone-implant interface. This study compared the frequency of mechanical failures between augmented and non-augmented Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) nails. METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective study at a level 1 trauma centre included patients aged > 65 years with pertrochanteric fractures treated by a short augmented or non-augmented TFNA nail. The primary outcome was the comparison of cut-out or cut-through rates between groups at three and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 181 patients analysed, 103 had augmented TFNA nails and 78 had non-augmented TFNA nails. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of demographic characteristics, AO/OTA classification, or quality of reduction. The failure rate was significantly lower in the augmented group than in the non-augmented group: 1 (0.97%) versus 9 (11.54%) (p = 0.005). At six months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups concerning functional recovery, as measured by the Parker and EuroQoL 5-Dimensions scores. CONCLUSIONS: For patients aged over 65 years, the use of the augmented TFNA nail may reduce the risk of fixation failures such as cut-out.